RAM PRASAD Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -By means of this petition, petitioner has challenged the judgment of the Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 5th March, 1975 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) by which revision filed by the opposite party has been allowed and by condoning the delay in filing objection, matter has been sent to the Consolidation Officer for deciding the claim of the parties on the merits.

(2.) PARTIES counsel has been heard at some length.

(3.) IN response to the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the respondents submits that by the order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation only delay in filing the objection has been condoned and the rival claim of the parties including that of the objector is to be examined by the Consolidation Officer and thus, it is not a case for interference by this Court. It is further submitted that as nature of land is being claimed to be abadi, consolidation authorities have every jurisdiction to decide that question and, therefore, objection filed by objector cannot be said to be not maintainable.