(1.) These 12 writ petitions posted for admission involve identical questions for determination. Counsel for the parties are also the same. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged except in one writ petition. At the request of the counsel for the parties, writ petitions were heard on merits for being decided finally under the second proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXII, Rules of Court.
(2.) Brief facts leading to the petitions are
(3.) That the position of the petitioners in all, the writ petitions except Writ Petn. No. 17234 of 1986, Manvendra Pal Singh v. District Cane Officer, and Writ Petition No. 1412/89 Asambeer Singh v. D.C.O. is identical as in these petitions the petitioners were deputed by the District Assistant Registrar in exercise of powers under Rule 365 of the Rules for the purposes of completion of the records and the order of deputation came to an end by an order passed by the District Assistant Registrar, and as such the cases of all these petitioners can be considered together, as they are founded on identical questions of facts and of law.