UMESH SAXENA Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is aggrieved against the award of Labour Court dated 19-10-83 and consequential order passed in pursuance of the said award, and has challenged the same In this writ petition. His services are said to have been terminated on 16-7-82. He raised a labour dispute which was rejected by the Labour Court.

(2.) THE petitioner's case is that he was appointed as Pump Attendant in the Water Works Department on 1-4-81 and he worked on the said post opto 30-6-81 on the pay scale approved by the Government This appointment was ad hoc which was extended for a further period of six mouths by an order dated 17-6-81 which was communicated to the petitioner on 30-6-81. THE services of the petitioner were further extended for three months. THEn the petitioner, thereafter received a letter dated 16-7-82 to the effect that his services were terminated. On this letter the petitioner raised a labour dispute. A reference was made to the Labour Court by the appropriate Government. THE reference which was to be decided by the Labour Court was in respect of the termination order of the petitioner. THE labour Court issued the award and held the petitioner's termination from service justified.

(3.) IN his rejoinder-affidavit, the petitioner has reiterated ail that what is stated in the writ petition and he has submitted that the provisions of INdustrial Disputes Act protect his rights and he cannot be thrown out without following the mandatory provisions of the INdustrial Disputes Act.