MOTI Vs. MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI NAGAR MAHAPALIKA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD teamed counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) THE petitioner is a Driver in the Nagar Mahapalika, Kanpur. THEre was a dispute regarding the age of the petitioner in connection with his superannuation. THE Nagar Mahapalika referred the case of the petitioner for the medical report. THE Medical Superintendent, U.H M. Hospital, Kanpur, on 27-5-1991 submitted the report (Annexure 2 to the petition). THEreafter, vide order dated 20-12-1991, the Mukhya Nagar Adhikari passed an order for superannuation of the pensioner on the basis of the age recorded in the service book and the petitioner was required to retire on 31-12-1991. THE Mukhya Nagar Adhikari has not considered the medical report.