BRAHMA DEO Vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition is directed against an order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 16-3-1982.

(2.) THE brief facts of the case are that permission was sought from the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) for executing a sale deed in respect of chak nos. 1 and 60. THEreafter, sale deed was executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondent nos. 4 and 5 An application was filed by respondent nos. 4 and 5 for mutation of their names on the basis of a registered sals deed executed by the petitioner in their favour. Petitioner however, filed an objection in respect of chak no 1. Mutation application in respect of chak no. 60 was allowed by the Consolidation Officer but that in respect of chak no 1 was rejected. THE appeal preferred by the respondent nos. 4 and 5 was allowed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) as a result whereof their application for mutation of their names in chak no 1 also stood allowed. Petitioner went on revision, which too was rejected by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. Aggrieved, the petitioner has come before this Court by way of present writ petition.

(3.) HAVING considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am satisfied that the respondents no. 1 and 2 have not committed any error calling for any interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.