BALIRAM Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present writ petition has been directed against the order dated 20-6-86, passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer the respondent no. 2, the order dated 24-12-91 and the order dated 13-4-92 passed by the Board of Revenue, the Respondent no. 1.

(2.) THE dispute was raised in [respect of plot No. 687/2 area .26 situate an village Ishri, Pargana Sikandarpur Garvi, Tehsil Rasra, Distt. Ballia. This plot has been given new numbers as 270 area .24 and plot no. 274 area 1 chemical. THE plot No. 687/2 was recorded in the name of Shiv Ji Maharaj, a deity.

(3.) THE petitioner filed revision against the said order before the Commissioner. THE Additional Commissioner II Varanasi Division Varanasi recommended to the Board of Revenue that the case may be remanded for reconsideration of the application. THE Board of Revenue did not accept the recommendation of the Additional Commissioner and found that a fraud was practiced upon the Court and it was as fit case in which the compromise decree should be set aside. It dismissed the revision by order dated 24-12-1991. THE petitioners have challenged these orders.