OM PRAKASH Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY CEILING

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel.

(2.) THIS petition has been filed questioning the order dated 20-2-1992 passed by the prescribed authority under the U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by which be has refused to abate the proceedings on the ground that substitution application for bringing the heirs of tenure-holder late Shri Jyoti Prasad was not moved within time prescribed by law.

(3.) THE learned Standing Counsel on the other hand justified the order of the prescribed authority rejecting the prayer of the petitioner to abate the proceedings.