(1.) FOR the assessment year 1974 -75 the assessee filed its return of income on September 20, 1974, showing an income of Rs. 16,894. The auditor's report in the prescribed form as required by Section 12A of the I.T. Act was not attached to the return. The assessee filed a revised return on January 31, 1975, along with the auditor's report. It appears that for the assessment year 1974 -75 the Department prescribed a new form of return. The assessee, consequently, filed another return on March 29, 1975, on the prescribed form along with the auditor's report. The assessee's total income exceeded Rs. 25,000. The ITO rejected the assessee's claim for exemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Act on the ground that it had failed to comply with the provisions of Section 12A(b) as its income, without giving effect to the provisions of Sections 11 and 12, exceeded Rs. 25,000 and the accounts were not got audited by the time the original return was filed. The ITO further held that the assessee was not entitled to file a revised return since it had filed the return under Section 139(4A) of the Act.
(2.) THE AAC took the view that the assessee was entitled to file the revised return under Section 139(5) as Section 139(4A) makes all the provisions of the Act applicable to a return filed under Section 139(1). The Revenue went up in appeal. The Income -tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Allahabad, upheld the view taken by the AAC. At the instance of the Revenue the following question has been referred for the opinion of this court :
(3.) AS noted earlier, the assessee filed the earlier return under Sub -section (4A) of Section 139. That provision provides that when a return is filed under Sub -section (4A) 'all the provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply as if it were a return required to be furnished under Sub -section (1)'. The first requirement for the applicability of Sub -section (5) was, therefore, satisfied in the present case.