LAWS(ALL)-1982-5-10

GOYAL COMMERCIAL Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On May 06, 1982
Goyal Commercial Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS group of writ petitions challenges the constitutional validity of, (i) Section 28 -B of the U. P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and (ii) Rule 87 and form XXXIV of the U. P. Sales Tax Rules.

(2.) THE petitioners carry on the business of purchase and sale of coal and transportation for hire. The case set up by the petitioners is that they purchase coal from collieries located in the States of West Bengal, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh and transport it to the States of Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, etc. The petitioners approached the Coal India Limited or its subsidiaries who authorise the petitioners to purchase coal from specified collieries. Coal from the collieries on its way to the States of Punjab, Haryana, etc., has to pass through the State of Uttar Pradesh. Since railway wagons are not easily available at colliery railway stations, the petitioner transported coal by road in trucks. The trucks enter the State of Uttar Pradesh through the Robertsganj check post in the district of Mirzapur or through Naubatpur check post in the district of Varanasi. Due to shortage of diesel and also because transport by rail is cheaper, the petitioners, subject to the availability of the railway wagons, transport coal by rail from railway stations of Varanasi, Mirzapur and Allahabad. Coal brought in by truck is unloaded in the vicinity of the aforesaid railway stations and then transported by rail to the petitioners' depots in Haryana, Punjab, etc., as and when wagons are available.

(3.) THE stand taken by the petitioners is wholly untenable. The petitioners themselves purchase coal from collieries situated outside the State of U. P. When the vehicles enter the State of Uttar Pradesh, the known destination of the vehicles is a place situated in the State of Uttar Pradesh and coal is unloaded within the State of Uttar Pradesh. The vehicles carrying coal are not bound for any other place outside the State of Uttar Pradesh. In such a situation Section 28 -B of the Act is not at all attracted. It is only when a vehicle coming from any place outside the State and bound for any other place outside the State passes through the State of Uttar Pradesh that Section 28 -B of the Act is attracted. The case of the petitioners is covered by Section 28 -A of the Act. It applies to a case where a person intends to bring, import or otherwise receive in the State from any place outside the State any taxable goods under the Act. If a person importing or receiving into the State is a registered dealer, he has to obtain a declaration in form XXXI from the Sales Tax Officer concerned as provided by Rule 85. If a person other than a registered dealer wishes to import or receive into the State from any place outside the State, he has to obtain a certificate from the Sales Tax Officer concerned in form XXXII as provided by Rule 86. Section 28 -B and Rule 87 are applicable to cases where the goods destined for place outside the State of Uttar Pradesh pass through the State of Uttar Pradesh on their onward journey. The