SAKALRAJ Vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION LUCKNOW

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order dated 20th August 1980 passed by the Assistant Director, Consolidation.

(2.) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case are that the objection filed by opposite party No. 3 under Sec. 9-A of C. H. Act was dismissed in default on 20th February, 1980. The restoration application was moved by her within limitation. This application was allowed and the case was restored by the Consolidation Officer by order dated 14th March, 1980. Against this order the petitioner filed revision under Section 48 of C. H. Act which was heard and dismissed by the Assistant Settlement Officer, Consolidation, the opposite party No. 1. Both these orders have been challenged by the petitioners in this writ petition.

(3.) THE writ petition being devoid of merit is accordingly dismissed. I, however, direct the parties to bear their own costs. THE stay order dated 24-10-80 is hereby vacated. Petition dismissed.