VISHWAMITRA Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution arises out of the proceedings under section 2-A. The petitioner contended that the respondent no. 2 Hari Shanker was inducted by him in the accommodation in dispute as a licensee with effect from 1-1-1980 under Section 2-A of the Act. The respondent no. 2, however, contested the said claim of the petitioner and contended that he was a tenant and not a licensee. By the impugned order the Prescribed Authority rejected the claim of the petitioner and upheld the contention of the respondent no. 2.

(2.) FEELING aggrieved, the petitioner has come up in the instant petition and in support there of, I have heard Dr. Gyan Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner.

(3.) THIS petition accordingly fails and is dismissed in limine. Petition dismissed.