SATYA PRAKASH Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) :-

(2.) THIS petition arises out of the dispute between the landlord and the tenant.

(3.) THIS petition is wholly uncalled for and not maintainable. It seems that on account of the failure of the petitioner to comply with the provisions of Order 15 Rule 5 CPC his defence had been struck off. The plaintiff landlord's case was that the rent was due for the period from 1-12-1973 onwards. The petitioner as the defendant was alleging that he had paid rent upto 14-10-1975. The plaintiff landlord had entered into the witness-box and had deposed to the aforesaid effect, namely that the rent had not been paid to him with effect from 1-12-73.