SUSHIL KUMAR Vs. U P STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Sushil Kumar has moved this application to review the judgment dated 12_4_19821, in his habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The District Judge, Allahabad by order dated 3-11-1981 directed the detention of the petitioner Sushil Kumar in Central Prison, Naini under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. The Bench constituting of myself and Honble 5. 3. Hyder, 3., after hearing the parties counsel and carefully considering the cases cited found that the order of detention was not in any way bad in law. The writ petition was, therefore, dismissed

(2.) Sri D. S. Misra Advocate for the applicant has been heard at length.

(3.) In the case of Ariham Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma, it was held that the power of review inheres in every High Court and there is nothing in Article 226 of the Constitution to preclude a High Court for exercising the power of review to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and palpable errors committed by it. The Supreme Court then indicated the limits of the exercise of power of review in the following words: