DEVENDRAPAL SINGH Vs. JOINT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION MATHURA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the judgment of the revisional court dated 18-7-1979.

(2.) THE main grievance of the learned counsel for the petitioner before me is that the revisional court was prejudiced against the petitioner and has given judgment under bias, hence the judgment of the revisional court should be quashed and the case should be sent back to the revisional court for examining the claims of the parties in a fair manner.

(3.) EMPHASIZING the above observations of the revisional court, the learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the revisional court has not applied its fair mind to the claims of the parties and has proceeded to decide the revision petition in a biased manner' against the petitioner hence its judgment should be quashed. My attention has been drawn to the ruling of their Lordships of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1965 Supreme Court page 1303 (1). Vide paragraph 10 of the aforesaid ruling it has been observed as below :-