RAM PYARE Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THROUGH this petition the order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation dismissing as not maintainable the application for review of the order pass ed in Revision is being challenged. Admit tedly there is no specific provision in the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, here inafter referred to as the Act, conferring on the Deputy Director of Consolidation the power to review his judgment Learned counsel contends that Section 41 of the Act confers such power.

(2.) SECTION 41 reads as under. "Unless otherwise expressly provided by or under this Act, the provisions of Chapters IX and X of the U. P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 shall apply to all proceedings including appeal and applications under this Act." Chapter X of the Land Revenue Act gives the power to the Board of Revenue to review its judgment There is, however, no provi sion therein regarding review of orders by authorities under the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act

(3.) THE petition is accordingly dismissed. Petition dismissed.