REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

BABU KHAN Appellant

V/S

SHIVA KUMAR Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SRI AFZAL HUSAIN V. DM KANPUR [REFERRED TO]
MOHD. SAMI V. SAVITRI DEVI [REFERRED TO]
GHANSHIAM DAS V. DEVI PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
SMT. DHANWATI DEVI V. KHUDABAND KARIM JALLEY JALALHU [REFERRED TO]
AMI CHAND V. RAM SHARAN DAS [REFERRED TO]
NARAYAN CHAND DASS V. PANNA LAL [REFERRED TO]
CHANDA LAL VS. RAM KISHAN [REFERRED TO]
Abdul Sami and another VS. Mohammad Noor [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an appeal by the unsuccessful Defendant, arising out of following facts:

(2.) THE suit was contested by the Defendant and it was pleaded, inter alia, that the enclosed compound with a room inside was "accommodation" and therefore, the suit was barred by Section 3 of the UP (Temp.) Control of Rent and Eviction Act.

(3.) THE only short question which arises for determination in this appeal is as to whether an Ahata, without any roofed structure, is an "accommodation", as provided Under Section 2(a) of the UP (Temp.) Control of Rent and Eviction Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

Click here to view full judgment.

BABU KHAN Vs. SHIVA KUMAR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address