HAZI RAHMETULLA Vs. CHAUDHARI VIDYA BHUSAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS Civil Revision has been referred to a Bench by a learned Single Judge. The order of the learned Single Judge indicates that he has made the reference to a larger Bench for the disposal of the revision, even though he has formulated three points which, in his view, merited consideration for the purposes of the determination of the revision on the merits.

(2.) THE three questions which the learned Single judge formulated were, to quote his words:-"

(3.) ON the 3rd of February 1955 Haji Rahmatullah made an application to the Court of the Munsif, Nainital along with a copy of the award which was made on the 17th of January 1955, referred to above, with a prayer that we award be made the rule of the Court and that a decree for a sum of Rs. 4476/8/- be made along with costs of the application. This application the revisionist purported to make under the provisions of Section 14 of the Indian Arbitration Act for just before the recitals in the application, what was recorded on the application was this: