(1.) Matter taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist.
(2.) Notice was issued to the opposite party no. 2 vide order dtd. 11/5/2005. As per office report dtd. 1/8/2005, it is apparent that notice has been duly served personally on the opposite party no. 2.
(3.) No one appears on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. Service of notice upon the opposite party no. 2 is thus sufficient.