VISHRANT AGARWAL Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE JHANSI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THROUGH this transfer application under Section 24, C.P.C., transfer of Civil Appeal No.24 of 1999 pending before District Judge, Jhansi has been sought to some other district by legal representative of defendant respondent No.6 in the appeal. In this transfer application following order was passed by me on 21.02.2012:

(3.) IN view of utterly irresponsible attitude of both the parties, it is essential to transfer the case to a district which is farthest from Jhansi even though each and every allegation made against Presiding Officer of the court of District Judge, Jhansi is disbelieved by this Court. It is also essential in the interest of justice to impose heavy cost in the form of damages against both the parties for not only misusing but also abusing the process of court.