JAGDISH BANKEY LAL Vs. CHANDRABHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) It is further contended by Counsel for the appellant that the WILL in question was never executed by Late Smt. Gopi Bibi and the same was unregistered and purportedly bear the signature of Shri J.P. Garg, advocate.

(3.) Learned Counsel for respondent has not been able to reply to the query of the Court that if the Court below comes to the conclusion that property in dispute is joint property of the plaintiffs how would the 1/20 share of the property claimed by the plaintiff, would be given to him as observed by it in the judgment, and in that case if property is transferred by the respondent solely as owner to third parties, how could the 1/20 property be returned to him.