HANSA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the revisionists and learned A.G.A. for the State.

(2.) BY this revision application, the revisionists have challenged the summoning order dated 23.5.2012 passed by A.C.J.M., Court No.

(3.) CHALLENGING the summoning order, the learned counsel for the revisionists, relying on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Jile Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2012) 3 SCC 383, contended that the Magistrate had no power to summon the revisionists on a private complaint once in respect of the same offence cognizance was taken on a police report which related to only one accused and that the only course left for the complainant was to await for the commencement of trial and to take recourse to the provisions of Section 319 Cr.P.C., after leading of evidence.