VEERWATI Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CRIMINAL revision is taken up in the revised list. Learned counsel for the revisionist has not appeared to argue the revision.

(2.) HEARD learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

(3.) THUS the revisionist Smt. Veerwati dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the courts below and assailed the same in this revision. In the case in hand, a boy of four years was allegedly injured on 15.2.1998 around 5:00 p.m., when the first informant Nemwati was away for some work leaving the injured in the house. After coming back from work, the first informant was informed that the tongue of the boy was injured by the revisionist and blood was oozing out of tongue injury. Her report at Police Station was not correctly recorded and simple case of Marpit was registered.