RAJESHWARI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Mahesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed with Annexures in Hindi. The interim order of a learned Single Judge in writ petition No. 665 of 2007 dated 24th of July, 2012 and another interim order of a Division Bench dated 5th October, 2012 in writ petition No. 51172 of 2012 has been circulated by the Registrar General under the orders of the Division Bench and accordingly the aforesaid two orders have been placed before this Court which are quoted herein under for ready reference:

(2.) It is on account of these orders that the Court found it necessary to deal with the matter as this Court finds that the relevant material in respect of court language including the High Court Rules and the judgments of this Court do not appear to have been placed either before the learned Single Judge or before the Division Bench in order to appreciate the entire controversy in correct perspective.

(3.) For the purpose of understanding the genesis of this dispute, that had arisen on account of the aforesaid orders, reference be had to Article 348 of the Constitution of India which is quoted herein under: