MAMTA Vs. STATE OF UP

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer for quashing the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1499 of 2012, under Sections 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(10) of SC/ST Act, Police Station-Lar, District Deoria as well as the impugned orders dated 20.6.2012 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (JD), Court No. 20, Deoria whereby the application filed by the applicant for quashing of the cognisance order dated 6.4.2012 taken against the opposite party No. 2 on the ground of compromise entered into between the applicant and opposite party No. 2 has been rejected. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the material on record.

(2.) Learned counsel for the applicants submits that an application for seeking compromise supported by an affidavit was filed by the present applicant who is also informant before the Trial Court. In paragraph No. 3 of the said affidavit, it is stated that she has entered into compromise and dispute between the parties has been settled. She prayed that cognizance taken by the Court below in this behalf be set aside.

(3.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.