(1.) Heard Shri Ram Sajivan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
(2.) In support of his submissions, he has placed reliance upon the judgment of this Court in Raja Ram v. DDC, Basti and others, 1993 RevDec 32.
(3.) It appears, the CO has ignored the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner vide order dated 25.1.2010, which was impugned in the revision. Before the DDC also, the argument was advanced that since the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (In short CPC) in toto, are not applicable, and only few principles are applicable under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (in short, Act), therefore, the CO has erred in passing the order dated 25.1.2010. The DDC has observed that since the case is still proceeding, therefore, no interference is called for, and dismissed the revision.