MAYANK OJHA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A.

(2.) In the first FIR, the allegations was that on 10.5.2012 when the informant Jitendra Yadav was standing in the line of the ATM of Punjab National Bank, at Omdenganj, Ballia, three unknown persons approached him and offered to help him in taking out of Rs. 5000/- from his account as he was unable to take out the money from the ATM machine. At that time the accused appears to have changed his ATM card. When he visited an ATM machine on 25.5.2012, he was unable to access his account, and visited the concerned bank where her learnt that Rs. 41,000/- had been withdrawn from his account on different dates.

(3.) In a similar manner in the second FIR dated 28.6.12 it is mentioned that the ATM card of Union Bank of complainant Mushtaq was also changed by three unnamed persons, who on realising that his card had been changed as he was unable to access his ATM account, contacted his Bank, where he was informed that Rs. 82,700/- has been withdrawn from his account in different transactions.