RAM UGRAH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Rishikesh Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri A.K. Singh, learned Counsel for the heirs of respondent No. 5 and the respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

(2.) THIS petition came to be filed assailing the proceedings undertaken by the Assistant Consolidation Officer for measurement of a Chakroad over plot No. 673 in village and post Baurawa, Pargana Saidpur, District Ghazipur.

(3.) WHEN the matter was heard today Sri A.K. Singh, learned Counsel for the contesting respondents on the basis of instructions received has stated at the bar that the village has not yet been de- notified under section 52 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1953 Act').