SHAHEN SHAH Vs. CIVIL JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order is not revisable as it is not a final award. In support he has placed reliance upon a decision of this Court in Naqshe Ali v. U.P. Sunni Central Wakf Board,1970 AllLJ 815.

(3.) On the basis of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners is trying to draw an inference that revision is maintainable only when a final award is made by the Wakf Tribunal and not against any interlocutory order passed it.