ABDULLA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A photostat copy of order dated 5.4.21012 passed in a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 11712 of 2012 ( Khursheed Anwar Khan Vs. State of U.P. and another) has been filed today by learned counsel for the applicant which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant states that similar order may be passed in this petition as the case is of similar nature. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the charge sheet dated 12.3.2012 submitted in case crime no. 939/2011 on which the learned A.C.J.M.,-II Janunpur has taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 147, 504, 506, 352, 323, 325, 308 I.P.C., P.S. Khetasaray district Jaunpur in case no. 492 of 2012 as well as the proceedings of the aforementioned case.

(2.) THE contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got right of discharge under Sections 239 or 227/228 Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court. The prayer for quashing the charge sheet is refused.

(3.) IN case the applicants fail to appear before the court concerned on the dates fixed it will be open to the Public Prosecutor to move an application for cancelling the order of interim/final bail and the Court concerned may pass an appropriate order on merits. For a period of four weeks from today or till the applicant surrender before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. However, it is made clear that in case the applicant fails to move an application for surrender before the court concerned within the time indicated hereinabove, this application shall stand automatically dismissed. However, it is further provided that in case the applicant moves an application for discharge along with the certified copy of this order before the court concerned, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law at appropriate stage. With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of.