MOHAMMAD AKHLAK Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri. T.D. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri. Sudhir Bharti, has appeared for respondents. Petitioner has filed this writ petition making the following prayers:

(2.) A bare perusal of the writ petition reveals that in connection with a contract with the railways, petitioner had Instituted original suit No. 822 of 2007. The said suit has been dismissed vide judgment and order dated 9.5.2012 by the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Moradabad. It is against the aforesaid judgment and order that the present writ petition has been filed with an ancillary prayer for the payment of certain amount and for permission to complete the balance work. Petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court without any sense of responsibility in a very casual manner as if the said jurisdiction is a remedy for every ill.

(3.) IN view of above, as the petitioner has not availed the aforesaid remedy, I am of the opinion that the writ petition is not only misconceived but is ill advised. It is accordingly dismissed with a token cost of Rs.100 to be deposited by the petitioner within two weeks with the registry of the court failing which it shall be realised as arrears of land revenue.