CHANDRAPAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition is made under Article 226 by a Class IV employee in the judgeship of Bareilly. He is aggrieved by the order of the District Judge dated 30.4.2007 whereby he has been compulsorily retired under the U.P.Fundamental Rules 56 -C.

(2.) The present dispute arose in the following circumstances:-

(3.) The aforesaid Screening Committee had scrutinized the entire service record of the petitioner and other employees. The Committee had submitted its report on 28.2.2007 wherein it had recommended that the petitioner should not be continued in service in the public interest and he should be compulsorily retired. The report of Screening Committee was accepted by by the then District Judge Bareilly. Consequent upon, he issued the impugned order under the U.P.Fundamental Rules 56-C of the Financial Hand Book Vol.II (Part II to IV).