NAWAB SINGH Vs. D D C

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED counsel for petitioner by the impugned orders dated 23.03.2001 the Deputy Director, Consolidation in Case No.80 of 2001 (Nawab Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others) under Section 48 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act has directed the name of the petitioner to be expunged from the revenue records for the reason that the entry itself is forged and no record of how the entry was made is available before the authorities and in the inquiry conducted the Lekhpal, namely, Sri Tek Singh has also been dismissed from service. Petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 02.12.2008 whereby the Deputy Director, Consolidation has directed that the plot in question be entered in the revenue records in the name of Gaon Sabha/Banjar and the petitioner's name be expunged.

(2.) THE Stamp Reporter has reported that this writ petition is beyond time by three years and 81 days. THE explanation given by the petitioner in paragraph no.15 is that the impugned orders were ex-parte and no notice was given to the petitioner but when he came to know about the order, he has filed this writ petition.

(3.) IN view of the aforesaid circumstances, until further orders of this Court, petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the land in question in pursuance of the impugned order dated 23.03.2001 and order dated 02.12.2008 passed by the Deputy Director, Consolidation in Case No.80 of 2001 under Section 48 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act.