CHET RAM Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I have heard Sri Brijesh Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Amit Krishna, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4. Learned Standing counsel who has accepted notice on behalf of respondents no. 1,2 and 3 and Sri D.D. Chauhan who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 5 are present.

(2.) PARTIES have exchanged pleadings and apart from counter and rejoinder affidavits a supplementary affidavit has also been filed on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the parties agreed for final disposal of the writ petition at the admission stage itself.

(3.) IMPUGNING the aforesaid orders, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the valuable land of the petitioners on the road side has been taken away and the finding that their plot no. 237 has an extra area is perverse.