FAYADEEN DHOBEE Vs. CIVIL JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.1 and perused the record.

(2.) By means of the instant writ petition, petitioner has sought for a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing learned Civil Judge (S.D.) North, Court No.25, District and Sessions Court, Sultanpur to decide Regular Suit No.267 of 1997 (Fayadeen v. Ambika Prasad Pandey), as expeditiously as possible within a period stipulated by the court.

(3.) A perusal of the copy of order sheet, contained as Annexure No.2 shows that the suit was filed on 24.02.1997 and written statement has also been filed. The learned Trial Court framed issues on 24.11.2005 and decided issue no.2 (of valuation) on the same day. Under order 14 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure guidelines for framing of issues have been given, which is reproduced below:-