LAWS(ALL)-2012-5-151

MATHURA PRASAD Vs. STATE OF U P

Decided On May 25, 2012
MATHURA PRASAD Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U P Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CHALLENGE in this appeal is the judgement and order dated 23.10.2003 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.1), Pilibhit in S.T. No. 553 of 2002 (State Vs. Mathura Prasad & others) convicting and sentencing the appellants under Section 302 read with section 34 IPC for the life imprisonment with the fine of Rs.10,000/- to each of the appellants and in default of payment of fine further one year's rigorous imprisonment and under Section 307 read with section 34 IPC for ten years' R.I. with the fine of Rs.5000/- to each of the appellants and in default of payment of fine further six months additional imprisonment with further direction that both the sentences shall run concurrently. Since both these appeals are connected to each other, hence they are being decided together with common judgement. Abbreviated back ground facts are that the deceased Haripal Verma, husband of the informant Smt. Krishna Devi, was the sitting Pradhan of Village Aamkheda, police station Barkheda, District Pilibhit. On 14.12.2001 at about 4.30 pm he went for marketing to Adhkata along with Ram Kumar son of Bihari Lal (P.W-2) and Heera Lal son of Bholey Ram (P.W-3), both resident of same village Aamkheda, on a motorcycle. In the evening at about 7.30 pm on return for their village, when they reached near the field of Chhatrapal son of Roshan Lal, on the eastern side of the road accused appellant no.1 Mathura Prasad armed with banka, Jagdish Prasad, appellant no.2 with countrymade pistol and one, unknown person having armed with lathi were seen standing, in the light of motorcycle. It was alleged that motorcycle was driven by Heera Lal (P.W-3), Ram Kumar (P.W-2) was pillion rider while the deceased Haripal Verma, Pradhan was seated between them. As they reached near to them unknown assailant gave a lathi blow to Heera Lal, on account of which the motorcycle got disbalanced and had fallen in a ditch in the eastern side of the road. All the accused persons thereafter caught hold the deceased and started beating with lathi and banka. Both, Ram Kumar and the deceased, in order to save their lives, ran towards the eastern side. However, the deceased could not reach beyond the field of Nokhey Lal and he was surrounded by the assailants and was thereafter assassinated by firearm and banka. It was further alleged that at the same time Heera Lal son of Kadhey Ram along with Chhatrapal of the village have also arrived at the place of incident in another motorcycle and they have also witnessed the accused appellants lambasting the deceased in the source of light of the motorcycle. Thereafter Heera Lal (injured) went to the house of the deceased and informed his wife Smt. Krishna Devi about the incident. On being informed, informant Smt. Krishna Devi (P.W-1) went to the police station Barkheda along with Heera Lal (P.W-3) after covering a distance of four and half kilometres where she lodged written FIR (Ex Ka-1) on the same day at about 9.45 pm, which she got scribed through one, Bhagwan Das.

(2.) HEAD Moharrir, Shyam Lal (P.W-6) registered the written report at crime no.430 of 2001, under Sections 302/307 IPC, prepared the chik FIR (Ex Ka-2) and made relevant entry in G.D. The investigation was entrusted to S.O., P.L. Vishwakarma (P.W-9), who recorded the statement of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C., copied chik FIR and G.D. entry and thereafter reaching on the spot, performed inquest on the dead body and got inquest memo (Ex Ka-22) and other relevant documents prepared. A chiththi majrubi was prepared and the injured, Heera Lal was sent to PHC, Barkheda, Pilibhit where he was medically examined. The dead body was dispatched for autopsy purposes. Thereafter I.O. conducted spot inspection and prepared site plan (Ex Ka-10), collected blood stained earth and plain earth and recovered an empty cartridge (Ex Ka-11 and Ex Ka-12). On 16.12.2001 I.O. arrested both the appellants, Mathura Prasad and Jagdish and on their pointing out a countrymade pistol and a banka (weapons of assault) were recovered, which were exhibited as Ex Ka-13 on the day of their arrest. However, another co-accused Om Prakash was arrested on 25.12.2001 and from his pointing out a danda (Ex Ka-15) was recovered. On the basis of the alleged recovery of the weapons of assault, separate chik FIR(Ex Ka-7) was registered against appellants, Mathura Prasad and Jagdish under Section 25 Arms Act vide crime nos.431 of 2001 and 432 of 2001 respectively on the next day at about 6.10 pm and G.D. (Ex Ka-8) was prepared. S.I. Genda Lal Pawar, P.W-12 investigated the crime under Section 25 Arms Act and submitted the charge sheet (Ex Ka-30 and Ex Ka-31) against the appellants. Autopsy on the dead body of the deceased (Ex Ka-9) was performed on 15.12.2001 at 2.45 pm by Dr. Udai Veer Singh (P.W-10), Medical Officer, District Hospital Pilibhit. In the estimation of the Doctor, the deceased was aged about 35 years and half to one day had lapsed since his death. He was average built and rigor mortis was present on the upper and lower limbs. Following injuries were detected in the body of the deceased by P.W-10:

(3.) SINCE the appellants abjured the charges and claimed to be tried, hence their trial commenced. In order to establish guilt of the appellants, prosecution examined in all 12 witnesses during the course of trial. Out of whom, Smt. Krishna Devi (PW-1), informant, Ram Kumar (PW-2), Heera Lal son of Bholey Ram, injured (PW-3), Heera Lal son of Kadhey Ram (PW-4), Chhatrapal (PW-5) were witnesses of fact. Rest of witnesses Shyam Lal, Head Moharrir (PW-6), Dr. R.S. Saran (PW-7), Ramesh Chandra Mishra (PW-8), S.I. P.L. Vishwakarma, S.O. (PW-9), Dr. Uday Veer Singh (PW-10), Surendra Kumar (PW-11) and S.I. Genda Lal Pawar (PW-12) were the formal witnesses.