LAWS(ALL)-2012-2-220

SYED MUSTAJAB HUSAIN Vs. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decided On February 23, 2012
Syed Mustajab Husain Appellant
V/S
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition, at the instance of the plaintiff, seeks the quashing of the judgment and order dated 19th July, 2003 by which the Revision filed by the defendants for setting aside the judgment dated 30th November, 2000 of the Court of Small Causes for ejectment of the defendants and for recovery of arrears of rent, was allowed and SCC Suit No. 65 of 1997 was dismissed.

(2.) The first issue that will arise for consideration in this petition is whether the plaintiff Wakf was a Wakf registered in accordance with the provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Wakf Act') because section 87 of the Wakf Act, provides that no suit for the enforcement of any right on behalf of any wakf which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of the Wakf Act shall be instituted. The plaintiff had made a specific averment in paragraph 1 of the plaint that the building including the disputed shop belonged to the Wakf which was registered in the office of the U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as the 'Board') as Wakf No.23 but all that was stated in the written statement in reply to the averments made in paragraph 1 of the plaint was that the contents were not admitted for want of knowledge. It has, therefore, to be determined whether the averments made in paragraph 1 of the plaint stood admitted by the defendants in the absence of any specific denial in the Written Statement.

(3.) The second issue that will arise for consideration in this petition is whether the suit for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent can be filed by the Mutawalli of the Wakf on behalf of the Wakf.