SAROJ VERMA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Basic Education Officer, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.

(2.) THE present writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 21.11.2006 passed by respondent no.1, Joint Secretary, U.P. Government, Lucknow and to direct the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner (on the post of clerk) on compassionate ground.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that the mother of the petitioner is still under treatment of serious illness. The application of petitioner as well as mother of the petitioner was sent. Thereafter, several representation and reminders along-with subscription and medical opinion regarding treatment of the mother of petitioner was also sent mentioning that the family of late Ram Chandra Verma was still in financial crisis and there was no sufficient income to overcome the financial crisis. In view of the provision the relaxation in the period of limitation should have been given. Hence the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the direction be issued for appointment of the petitioner.