CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for both parties.

(2.) The controversy in the present writ petition is very limited. This petition has been filed by the petitioner against an order dated 17.7.2009 on an application made by the respondent-workman under Section 33C(2) of the I.D.Act, 1947 by which the authority has allowed the application of the respondent-workman directing the petitioner Bank to pay to the applicant his dues taking into account notional increments during the period of 31.8.1984 to 10.7.1997 on which date he was reinstated into service along with the interest also.

(3.) Learned Counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the operative part of the award dated 18.3.1997. Reference is to be made to paragraphs no.6 & 7 of the award, which is quoted here-in-below:-