LAWS(ALL)-2012-1-177

STATE OF U P Vs. BABLU

Decided On January 30, 2012
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Appellant
V/S
BABLU Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned AGA and perused the trial Court judgment and record.

(2.) THIS application for leave to appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.7, Shahjahanpur dated 11.01.2011 acquitting the accused respondent Babloo under Section 302/34 and 201 I.P.C.. One other person, namely, Chhotey Lal was also made an accused in this case but his trial was separated as he was found to be a juvenile.

(3.) LEANED AGA argued that there are two witnesses who saw the accused sitting near the place of occurrence. There is a witness of extra judicial confession, who is an independent witness and there is no reason for false implication of the accused respondent.