BRAJNANDAN SAROOP BHATNAGAR Vs. SANGRAM YADAVA & OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the appellant.

(2.) THIS appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 4th March, 1989.

(3.) COUNSEL for the appellant submits that the appellate court has misdirected itself and there is no right of the defendants over the land and there is also clear -cut finding in regard to the ownership and once the finding regarding the owner ship of the land has been recorded, then the order passed by the appellate court becomes inoperative. It is also submitted that the question regarding ownership of nazul land does not arise in this case.