BACHAN SINGH Vs. COMMISSIONER LKO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Shri N. N. Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned State Counsel and perused the record.

(2.) FACTS in brief of the present case are that the petitioners for purchasing a tractor in order to facilitate the farming had taken a loan of Rs.45,000/- from the opposite party no.3/State Bank of India,. Branch at Mishrikh, Distt- Sitapur.

(3.) ON behalf of auction purchaser Smt. Bittu Devi, a counter affidavit has been filed inter alia stating therein that the land in question has been purchased by her in the open auction on 12.2.1992. As a matter of fact on record, petitioners have not moved any application under Rule 285 H as alleged by him and only an application for objection has been filed by him which was rejected by opposite party no.1 on merit after hearing learned counsel for the parties by the impugned order dated 9.2.1992.