HAMID SHAH KHAN Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, RA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri P.K. Asthana, learned counsel for petitioner and perused the record.

(2.) WRIT petition is directed against the orders dated 8/9.7.1997 which relate to mutation.

(3.) RECENTLY , an Hon'ble Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No. 25961 of 2008 (Smt. Anisa Khan Vs. State of U.P. and others), decided on 29.7.2010 placing reliance on Jaipal Vs. Board of Revenue (supra), Summer Lal Vs. Board of Revenue 1996 (87) RD 569, Sahed Jan @ Bonde Vs. Board of Revenue 2004 (96) RD 656 and Jagdish Narain Vs. Board of Revenue 2007 (102) RD 20, referring to the impugned orders in that writ petition observed as under: