MUNNA LAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Veerendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 4 and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

(2.) The preliminary inquiry was done by the Naib Tehsildar, Bara. The report was submitted prior to the suspension order dated 3.3.2008 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bara, District Allahabad. The respondent No. 4 submitted his explanation on 8.1.2008 to the charge sheet issued to him. Upon consideration of the reply submitted by the respondent No. 4 the agreement of fair-price shop of the respondent No. 4 was cancelled by order dated 3.3.2008 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bara, District Allahabad. Against the order dated 3.3.2008, the appeal was filed by respondent No. 4 which was allowed by the Additional Commissioner (Food) Allahabad Division Allahabad and agreement of fair price shop of the respondent No. 4 was restored,

(3.) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was one of the complainant, at whose instance, inquiry was initiated against the respondent No. 4. The complainant has filed the present petition challenging the order dated 15.5.2012 passed by the appellate authority under Section 287 of U.P. Scheduled Commodities Distribution Order. As is evident from the narration of the fact given above, the petitioner is one of the complainant in the complaint filed against the respondent No. 4.