DAYA RAM SINGH Vs. TAHSILDAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) PETITIONERS No.1 and 2 are husband and wife respectively. The petitioner No.1 is said to be enlarged on bail in respect to a case crime No.272 of 2004 pursuant to a F.I.R. dated 3.7.2004 filed in Police Station Civil Lines, Aligarh under sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC on the allegation of embezzlement to the tune of Rs.32,35,000/ - from the Time Deposit Account of the Post Office where he was employed and working as Sub Post Master.

(3.) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the recovery of Rs.32,35,000/ - vide recovery certificate dated 15.6.2006 said to have been issued under section 4 of the Public Accountants Default Act, 1850 ( in short, the PAD Act).