RAJESH KUMAR SUMAN Vs. HARDEEP CHAND AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Sheetla Sahai learned Counsel for the applicant-revisionist.

(2.) Normally notice is required to be issued to the landlord but in the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall not be compelled to vacate the premises in dispute for a period of four months from today subject to the petitioner-tenant giving an undertaking within two weeks from today before the Court of Small Causes to the following effect:

(3.) It appears that the applicant was thereafter advised that he ought to have filed a revision as the writ petition was not maintainable against the order of eviction. The revision was entertained and the following interim order was passed on 16.1.2012: