TRIYUGI NARAIN MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) THE petitioners claim themselves to be the members of the general body of Maha Narayan Educational Society, Baraut Handia Allahabad.

(3.) SRI R.K.Ojha learned counsel for the respondent and the learned standing counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 contends that as a matter of fact the findings have been given in favour of the petitioner in relation to an allegation of a separate society being registered by the son of the respondent no.3. He further submits that there is a further finding in relation to the issue of membership which has also been returned in favour of the petitioner and as such there is no cause of action to the petitioner to question the validity of the said order. So far as the successive elections are concerned they remained unchallenged and it was in relation to the renewal of the society that th matter was considered by the Assistant Registrar whereof Sri Ojha learned counsel for the respondent contends that the dispute was only in relation to the renewal of the society and not holding of any election.