BAGWATI SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri R.C. Singh learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Sanjay Goswami, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent-State. Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties, as such, the matter is being disposed of finally at this stage itself.

(2.) THE present writ petition relates to proceedings undertaken under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. THE objection filed by the petitioners has been partly allowed and certain land has been declared surplus under the orders dated 16.1.1993. THE said order has been affirmed by the impugned order dated 23.11.2011 passed by the appellate authority and while proceeding to decide the appeal certain action has been taken in relation to the holding of one Jamal Ahmad, as a result whereof, this Court entertained the writ petition in the background aforesaid which has been narrated in the interim order dated 7.12.2011, reproduced hereinunder:

(3.) APART from this the deductions claimed by the petitioners and the contentions raised in respect of each of the objections to the finding of the prescribed authority also do not appear to have been dealt with in correct perspective.