URMILA Vs. AMIT KUMAR AGARWAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. The appellant has sought relief in this appeal for setting aside the judgment and order dated 26.3.2012 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 4, Meerut in Original Suit No. 1266 of 2007 and reject the application 8Ga for temporary injunction. The Court while granting temporary injunction has passed the following order, operative portion of which, reads thus:

(2.) Sri Navin Sinha, Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Prabhakar Dwivedi, appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1, submits that intention of the order of status quo conveyed by order dated 1.2.2011 passed in F.A.F.O. No. 271 of 2011 is same, hence same order may be passed in this case also.

(3.) In the circumstances, we modify the order dated 26.3.2012 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 4, Meerut in O.S. No. 1266 of 2007, and pass the order in the same terms and conditions as contained in the judgment dated 1.2.2011 passed in F.A.F.O. No. 271 of 2011 and direct that the appellant shall not transfer, alienate and encumber the property in question during the pendency or the suit. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid directions.