RAJENDRA PRASAD MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri B. N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed as temporary work charge employee by the Executive Engineer, Ground Water Department, Kanpur vide Office Order No. 312 dated 30.04.1977. Thereafter, he was promoted as Data Processor vide Office Memorandum no. 798 dated 15.01.1979 by the same authority. The petitioner approached this Court claiming regularization by filing Writ Petition No. 33285 of 1993. The said writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 05.05.1993 by making following observations :

(3.) A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating therein that the work charge employees are appointed depending upon nature and quantum of work required from time to time and the quantum of work is not such so as to appoint persons on permanent basis. It has further been averred that there is no sanction post of Data Processor in regular department as such the services of the petitioner are not liable to be regularized.