RAMVEER SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

(2.) BY means of impugned order dated 20.03.2012 the Commissioner, while admitting appeal of petitioner against order dated 01.03.2012 passed by Deputy Collector Puwayan cancelling fair price shop agreement of petitioner, has declined to grant any stay order for lack of any justification.

(3.) THE petitioner has sought stay against cancellation order dated 01.03.2012. It means that petitioner wanted that cancellation order should be stayed, as a result whereof he should be allowed to run his fair price shop. This amounts to grant of final relief. It is well settled that in the garb of interim order, the relief which amounts to final relief, cannot be granted. (See: State of U.P. and others Vs. Ram Khelawan & others JT 1995 (6) SC 305, Bank of Maharashtra Vs. Race Shipping and Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1995 SC 1368 and Division Bench Judgment of this Court in State of U.P. & another Vs. Smt. Dayavanti Khanna 1994 (24) ALR 140).